Last week, a poll question on the way you think the most effective to prevent internet piracy was asked. 60% of people voted for ban all file-sharing website, 20% of people voted for enforcing the internet law and another 20% of people voted for filtering illegal distributor related in search engine and 0% of people voted for neither.
It seem that most of the people would think that ban all file-sharing website is the best solution to prevent internet piracy. Banning all file-sharing website should be implement by the ISP in the country. But banning all file-sharing website doesn't really ban all file sharing website, we should only ban those that allow people to illegally file-sharing such as IsoHunt and PirateBay. If people are been block to access to file-sharing website then internet piracy might stop because no people will be able to those website.
Only 20% of people choose both on filtering illegal distributor related in search engine and enforcing internet law. Enforcing the internet law will punish those who did internet piracy; therefore , people who don't want to get fine or jailed will stay away from internet piracy. Filtering illegal distributor related in search engine will prevent the internet user to get any result when they search for any illegal file-sharing website.
Personally, I think that filtering illegal distributor related in search engine in not a very good way to prevent internet piracy. This is because a lot of people already know the file sharing website, they wouldn't need to search in search engine also can access to the website and starting illegal downloading.
If your country implement banning all file-sharing website, do you think it will be effective against preventing internet piracy?
>
